期刊
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 388-452出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2018.1498711
关键词
Fisheries management; fisheries policy; governance; institutions; rights and responsibilities
资金
- Walton Family Foundation
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Fisheries management in the USA, as governed by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), has been decidedly more successful at meeting its conservation goals than has fisheries management in the EU, as governed by the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). In an effort to explain the different outcomes in these two systems that share many management attributes, we evaluated them against a list of effective governance attributes gleaned from the literature. We also examined the distribution of rights and responsibilities within each system, and the resulting stewardship incentives. Five effective governance attributes are fully realized under the MSA but have historically been absent from the CFP system: adequate regulatory authority, effective enforcement mechanisms, science-based decision-making, conservation-oriented goals and clear objectives, and directives. These governance system gaps, along with uneven distributions of rights, responsibilities, and incentives, may be responsible for the observed difference in conservation outcomes.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据