4.3 Article

Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Melanoma Treated With Nivolumab: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

期刊

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 59-67

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.11.004

关键词

Biomarker; Immune-related adverse event; Melanoma; Nivolumab; Overall response rate

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17K15506]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K15506] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death 1 antibody, produces antitumor effects by activating host immunity, which also causes immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The aim of this study was to analyze the association between antitumor effect and irAEs induced by nivolumab in patients with melanoma. Methods: Fifteen patients with melanoma who had received nivolumab at Tokushima University Hospital or Ehime University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Patients who had and did not have irAEs during nivolumab treatment were classified into an irAEs-positive group (n = 8) and an irAEs-negative group (n = 7), respectively. We compared the disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups. Data on blood cell counts were also analyzed. Findings: After a median of 4 cycles of nivolumab treatment, irAEs occurred. The DCRs were 75% and 14% in the irAEs-positive and irAEs-negative groups, respectively (p < 0.05). OS in the irAEs-positive group was higher than that in the irAEs-negative group (p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that irAE occurrence affected OS with nivolumab treatment. Moreover, the increase in baseline peripheral lymphocyte count at the time of onset of irAEs was significantly greater in the irAEs-positive group than in the irAEs-negative group after 4 cycles of nivolumab treatment (p < 0.05). (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据