4.7 Review

Possible role of phytoestrogens in breast cancer via GPER-1/GPR30 signaling

期刊

CLINICAL SCIENCE
卷 132, 期 24, 页码 2583-2598

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20180885

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universidad Austral de Chile [S-2015-61]
  2. National Council for Science and Technology (CONICYT) [21130902, 21160084]
  3. Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences at Universidad Austral de Chile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogens generated within endocrine organs and the reproductive system act as ligands for at least three types of estrogen receptors. Estrogen receptors alpha (ER alpha) and beta (ER beta) belong to the so-called classical family of estrogen receptors, whereas the G protein-coupled receptor GPR30, also known as GPER-1, has been described as a novel estrogen receptor sited in the cell membrane of target cells. Furthermore, these receptors are under stimulation of a family of exogenous estrogens, known as phytoestrogens, which are a diverse group of non-steroidal plant compounds derived from plant food consumed by humans and animals. Because phytoestrogens are omnipresent in our daily diet, they are becoming increasingly important in both human health and disease. Recent evidence indicates that in addition to classical estrogen receptors, phytoestrogens also activate GPER-1 a relevant observation since GPER-1 is involved in several physiopathological disorders and especially in estrogen-dependent diseases such as breast cancer. The first estrogen receptors discovered were the classical ER alpha and ER beta, but from an evolutionary point of view G protein-coupled receptors trace their origins in history to over a billion years ago suggesting that estrogen receptors like GPER-1 may have been the targets of choice for ancient phytoestrogens and/or estrogens. This review provides a comprehensive and systematic literature search on phytoestrogens and its relationship with classical estrogen receptors and GPER-1 including its role in breast cancer, an issue still under discussion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据