4.5 Article

Bi-allelic recessive loss-of-function mutations in FIGLA cause premature ovarian insufficiency with short stature

期刊

CLINICAL GENETICS
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 409-414

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.13486

关键词

FIGLA; loss-of-function; mutation; premature ovarian insufficiency; short stature

资金

  1. 5010 project of Sun Yat-sen University [2014005]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [16ykjc15]
  3. National Key Research and development Program of China [2017YFC1001004]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801431]
  5. science technology research project of Guangzhou city [2014YZ-00512]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by decreased ovarian reserve and increased follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. It is rarely associated with short stature. FIGLA mutations with POI are identified with regard to heterozygosity; till date, only one affected family has been identified with homozygous mutations in FIGLA but without functional evaluation. Here, we described two POI patients from a consanguineous family from China. An 18-year-old girl and her sister presented with primary amenorrhea and increased FSH and luteinizing hormone levels, but the sister also presented with short stature and bone age delay. Whole-genome sequencing analysis identified a recurrent homozygous mutation in the FIGLA gene, c.2 T > C (p.Met1Thr), in this family member with POI; this variant was segregated within the pedigree. This change was absent in 382 control subjects, and we did not detect any mutations in 39 other idiopathic POI patients. in vitro functional analysis indicates that the p.Met1Thr mutation does not affect the transcription of the FIGLA gene, but blocks the synthesis of the full-length FIGLA protein. Our results support the notion that bi-allelic recessive loss-of-function effects of FIGLA contribute to POI patients with short stature and expand the FIGLA-related phenotypic spectrum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据