4.7 Article

Influence of recurrent rainfall and oxalic acid on phosphorus releasing from rocks phosphate in the Chaohu watershed, China

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 815-826

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.089

关键词

Phosphorus-rich rocks; Phosphorus release; Column leaching experiment; Chaohu watershed

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41772250, 41831289, 41877191]
  2. Public welfare geological survey program of Anhui Province [2015-g-26]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to understand the spatial distribution characteristics, loss risk and leaching behaviors of phosphorous from exposed rocks in typical small-area of Chaohu watershed, phosphorus-rich rock was selected for conducting a series of column leaching experiments to investigate the phosphorus leaching. By simulating the intermittent cycle of acid rainfall, effects of oxalic acid on the weathering of phosphate rocks were studied. Total phosphorus contents, pH and phosphate leaching capacity from phosphorus rocks were tested in the presence of oxalic acid at different dry-wet intervals. The results indicated that the cumulative release of phosphorus increased first and then decreased with the duration of dry-wet intervals increasing. Four typical kinetic equations can describe phosphorus release from phosphate rocks with the action of oxalic acid. The best fitting models were the weight function and parabolic equation, with a mean correlation coefficient R-2 of 0.9727 and 0.9941, respectively, which reached significance level. Total phosphorus (TP) leaching distribution in each column showed a tendency of gradually decreasing from top to bottom except for time interval of 5 d and 7 d. Occluded-bound P (Oc-P) is the dominant form in rocks. The change point value of rocks phosphorus is 4.11 mg kg(-1) after intermittent leaching, and the phosphorus loss risk is relatively large in some rocks formations. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据