4.7 Article

In vitro estrogenic activity of representative endocrine disrupting chemicals mixtures at environmentally relevant concentrations

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 396-403

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.067

关键词

Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Interaction; Yeast estrogen screen

资金

  1. Johnson Johnson

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to mixtures of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) has been hypothesized to produce potential synergistic or antagonistic effects that can cause undesired effects that are not reflected by the individual compounds. In this study, the estrogenic activities of 11 EDCs of global environmental concern were systematically investigated using the yeast estrogen screen (YES). The contribution of the individual chemical to the total endocrine activity of environmentally relevant mixtures was evaluated. Compared to 17 beta-estradiol (E2) as a standard, estrone (E1), estriol (E3), ethinyl estradiol (EE2), bisphenol-A (BPA), and genistein (GEN) showed estrogenic effects, while dibutyl phthalate (DBP), n-butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), nonyl phenol (NP) and 4-tert-octyl phenol (OP) showed anti-estrogenic effects. The 11 EDCs mixture at a constant environmentally relevant ratio also showed estrogenic activity. The mixtures data were fit to concentration addition (CA), response addition (RA) and interaction (IR) models, respectively. The IR model was not statistically different from the observed value and better predicted results than the CA model for mixtures of all 11 compounds. For the mixtures with the 6 estrogenic compounds only, additive effects were observed, and the data were well predicted by the CA and IR models. Further, in the 11 EDCs mixture the presence of EE2 at an environmentally relevant concentration did not increase the estrogenic activity as compared to a 10 EDCs mixture without EE2. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据