4.3 Article

An assessment of copper, zinc and cadmium contamination and their ecotoxicological effects in O-mediterranea Costa, 1853 (Amphipoda, Talitridae)

期刊

CHEMISTRY AND ECOLOGY
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 361-378

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02757540.2018.1554062

关键词

Biomonitoring; cadmium; concentration factor; copper; hepatopancreas; O; mediterranea; zinc

资金

  1. Erasmus Mundus Al Idrisi II Programme of the European Union
  2. Research Laboratory of Diversity, Management and Conservation of Biological Systems, Tunis, Tunisia [LR18ES06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was conducted to compare metals bioaccumulation in the Talitrid O. mediterranea collected from the banks of Bizerte lagoon. Individuals were exposed to a series of contaminated soil with different concentrations of cadmium, copper, and zinc. Biological and physiological responses were highlighted. Body metals concentrations were measured in the talitrid using flame atomic emission spectrometry. Results showed that after the second week, the mortality increased especially with cadmium exposure, and a mass gain was obtained between weeks for copper and zinc. Furthermore, the concentration factor indicated that O. mediterranea could be considered as a macroconcentrator of copper and zinc. Histopathological analysis showed that the different metals concentrations induced significant changes in the morphology and in the ultrastructural organisation of hepatopancreatic cells. Significant alterations obtained after metals exposure were the increase in the number of the majority cell organelles. Also, heavy metals were present in the form of numerous granules with different size in the cell surface. Furthermore, metals exposure affected the brush border causing the disruption of microvilli filament. Through these results, O. mediterranea could be a good indicator providing measurable responses. It could be an attractive candidate for the biochemical study of heavy metals toxicity in coastal ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据