4.7 Article

The degradation of diethyl phthalate by reduced smectite clays and dissolved oxygen

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 355, 期 -, 页码 247-254

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.160

关键词

Diethyl phthalate; Electron transfer; Hydroxyl radical; Reduced clay particles; Structural Fe

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0207001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41773125]
  3. Research Instrument Development Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [YZ201638]
  4. 135 Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [ISSASIP1620]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduced smectite clay plays an important role in producing hydroxyl radical (center dot OH) and degrading organic contaminants. In this study, the center dot OH formation was examined in the suspension of reduced clay particles (Red-Na-NAu-2) with oxygen; diethyl phthalate (DEP), a widely detected plasticizer in soils, could be degraded in the reaction system. The results show the reactivity of Red-Na-NAu-2 is related to iron content, reduction extents and particle sizes; the oxidation process of Red-Na-NAu-2 may change structural Fe coordination or even destruct clay morphology. There are two stages in the oxidation process, fast oxidation and slow oxidation, which were closely related to active structural Fe(II) entities (e.g. Fe(II) Fe(II) Fe(II)-OH) and less active structural Fe(II) entities (e.g. Fe(II) Fe(II)-OH), respectively. It was hypothesized that dissolved oxygen could accept electrons from Fe(II) in outer surface layers (tetrahedral layers and at broken edges) based on spectra (FTIR, XPS and EELS) analyses, and inner lattice Fe(II) in octahedral layers could donate electrons to outer surface Fe(III) through one-electron pathway. The findings of this study provide a thorough understanding about the degradation of organic pollutants in subsurface environments, an omitted natural attenuating pathway, which should be important in soil remediation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据