4.7 Article

Origami system for efficient solar driven distillation in emergency water supply

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 356, 期 -, 页码 869-876

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.070

关键词

Origami; Pencil; Photothermal material; Solar distillation; Emergency water supply

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573034]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment in HIT of China [2016DX14]
  3. HIT Environment and Ecology Innovation Special Funds [HSCJ201606]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [HIT.BRETIII.201417]
  5. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014T70324]
  6. Heilongjiang Prov. [LBH-TZ0606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Facing lack of infrastructure and no access of electricity, insuring drinking water for people during an emergency in remote area is becoming a great challenge. Here, we develop an origami as photothermal material based on daily pencil and paper for solar driven water purification in emergency. The drawn process destroyed the Van der Waals' force between graphite layers, making pencil cartridge exfoliated into thin graphite sheets. The paper fibers combined with graphite sheets were demonstrated with broadband absorption for solar energy harvesting and excellent hydrophilicity for water transportation. The origami structure effectively promoted the utilization of solar energy attributing to the increased solar absorption area and decreased solar reflection loss compared with planar system. In particular, the solar vapor efficiency and vapor evaporation rate of as-prepared origami system were reached to 80% and 1.16 kgm(-2) h(-1), respectively. In addition, the analog calculation results of COMSOL Multiphysics indicated that the origami structure was free from the dynamic solar motion. Herein, this nearly free cost, facile fabricated and high efficiency design would unlock a new generation of efficient water purification for water supply in emergency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据