4.4 Article

Selective Delivery of Doxorubicin to EGFR+ Cancer Cells by Cetuximab-DNA Conjugates

期刊

CHEMBIOCHEM
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1014-1018

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201800685

关键词

antitumor agents; cetuximab-DNA conjugates; doxorubicin; drug delivery; EGFR(+) cancer cells

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF81]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) Ph.D. scholarships from the Ministry of Education of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doxorubicin is a hydrophobic anticancer drug that has poor selectivity, due to the lack of active targeting capability. Here, learning lessons from the success of antibody-drug conjugates, we have designed a new doxorubicin delivery system without conjugating doxorubicin to antibody directly. In this setup, cetuximab, an antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in cancer cells, was conjugated to a single-stranded DNA with a carefully designed sequence in a site-selective manner by using the DNA-templated protein conjugation (DTPC) method. The DNA duplex in the conjugates serves as a carrier of doxorubicin through noncovalent intercalation, and cetuximab functions as the targeting agent; this could drastically decrease systemic toxicity and potentially avoid under- or overdosing. The size of conjugates loaded with doxorubicin was about 8.77 or 16.61nm when characterized by dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy, respectively. In vitro cytotoxicity and selective cancer cell killing was investigated against two EGFR(+) cell lines (KB and MDA-MB-231) and one EGFR(-) cell line (NIH-3T3). Cytotoxicity and flow cytometry data showed that doxorubicin loaded in cetuximab-DNA conjugates was more potent in terms of cell cytotoxicity than free doxorubicin in EGFR-overexpressed cell lines, thus suggesting that the conjugates were more selectively and easily taken up into cells, followed by rapid release of doxorubicin from the system into the cytoplasm from endosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据