4.4 Article

Proposal for a Migraine Aura Complexity Score

期刊

CEPHALALGIA
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 732-741

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102418815487

关键词

Migraine aura; complexity; visual; somatosensory; dysphasic; cortical thickness

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Serbia [175022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Currently, there is no scoring system for assessing the complexity of migraine aura. Our goal was to develop a Migraine Aura Complexity Score that synthesizes the quantity and quality of aura symptoms and to test its applicability in neuroimaging studies. Methods Patients with migraine aura were interviewed in order to obtain characteristics of migraine aura. Explorative and confirmatory analyses were used to develop the Migraine Aura Complexity Score. Median values were derived from 10 consecutive migraine auras in each patient. The Migraine Aura Complexity Score was correlated with an average cortical thickness of different brain areas in studied patients. The Surface-based Morphometric Analysis approach was used to estimate cortical thickness. Results This study included 23 (16 females and seven males) migraineurs with aura. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested the second-order model with three-factor measurement for grading migraine aura. The first factor is linked to higher cortical dysfunction during migraine aura, while the second is associated with the degree of involvement of primary visual and somatosensory cortices; the third linked symptoms of somatosensory aura and hand and head involvement. Positive correlation of Migraine Aura Complexity Score and averaged cortical thickness were found in the left and right hemispheres overall (r = 0.568, p = 0.007; r = 0.617, p = 0.003) and in some of their regions. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the Migraine Aura Complexity Score could be a valuable tool for assessing migraine aura. The score could be used in neuroradiological studies in order to achieve a stratification of patients with migraine aura.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据