4.6 Article

Tuberous sclerosis complex neuropathology requires glutamate-cysteine ligase

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-015-0225-z

关键词

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex; Glutamate-cysteine ligase; Cellular stress; Brain tumors; Cell death

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [PBZ-MNiI-2/1/2005]
  2. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013
  3. EPISTOP) [602391]
  4. National Science Centre [2011/03/B/NZ3/01970]
  5. Parent-Bridge program of the Foundation for Polish Science
  6. European Union under the European Regional Development Fund
  7. ERA-NET NEURON 'AMRePACELL' [06/2011]
  8. NCBiR
  9. Homing Plus programme of the Foundation for Polish Science [HOMING PLUS/2012-5/6]
  10. National Science Centre Sonata grant [2013/11/D/NZ3/01079]
  11. National Science Centre grant Opus [2012/05/B/NZ3/00429]
  12. Foundation for Polish Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a genetic disease resulting from mutation in TSC1 or TSC2 and subsequent hyperactivation of mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR). Common TSC features include brain lesions, such as cortical tubers and subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs). However, the current treatment with mTOR inhibitors has critical limitations. We aimed to identify new targets for TSC pharmacotherapy. Results: The results of our shRNA screen point to glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC), a key enzyme in glutathione synthesis, as a contributor to TSC-related phenotype. GCLC inhibition increased cellular stress and reduced mTOR hyperactivity in TSC2-depleted neurons and SEGA-derived cells. Moreover, patients' brain tubers showed elevated GCLC and stress markers expression. Finally, GCLC inhibition led to growth arrest and death of SEGA-derived cells. Conclusions: We describe GCLC as a part of redox adaptation in TSC, needed for overgrowth and survival of mutant cells, and provide a potential novel target for SEGA treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据