4.8 Article

Super-Enhancer-Associated Long Noncoding RNA HCCL5 Is Activated by ZEB1 and Promotes the Malignancy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 572-584

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0367

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802812]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030313129]
  3. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduates [CX2016B056]
  4. Open-End Fund for the Valuable and Precision Instruments of Central South University [CSUZC201746]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2015zzts096]
  6. Science and Technology Department Research Foundation of Hunan province [12JJ2052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most dominant causes of neoplasm-related deaths worldwide. In this study, we identify and characterize HCCL5, a novel cytoplasmic long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), as a crucial oncogene in HCC. HCCL5 promoted cell growth, G(1)-S transition, invasion, and metastasis while inhibiting apoptosis of HCC cells both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, HCCL5 was upregulated in TGF-beta 1-induced classical epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) models, and this lncRNA in turn accelerated the EMT phenotype by upregulating the expression of transcription factors Snail, Slug, ZEB1, and Twist1. HCCL5 was transcriptionally driven by ZEB1 via a super-enhancer and was significantly and frequently overexpressed in human HCC tissues, correlating with worse overall survival of patients with HCC. Together, this study characterizes HCCL5 as a super-enhancer-driven lncRNA promoting HCC cell viability, migration, and EMT. Our data also suggest that HCCL5 may serve as a novel prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in HCC. Significance: These findings identify the lncRNA HCCL5 as a super-enhancer-driven oncogenic factor that promotes the malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据