4.7 Article

Understanding the engagement of key decision support persons in patient decision making around breast cancer treatment

期刊

CANCER
卷 125, 期 10, 页码 1709-1716

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31956

关键词

breast cancer; decision making; significant others; social support; treatment

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01CA163233, HHSN261201300015I, HHSN26100006, K07CA196752-01]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-14-035-01]
  3. California Department of Public Health [103885]
  4. National Program of Cancer Registries of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5NU58DP003862-04/DP003862]
  5. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute [HHSN261201000140C, HHSN261201000035C, HHSN261201000034C]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5NU58DP003875-04-00]
  7. University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center (Cancer Control and Population Sciences Career Development Award)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Patients with breast cancer involve multiple decision support persons (DSPs) in treatment decision making, yet little is known about DSP engagement in decision making and its association with patient appraisal of the decision process. Methods Patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer reported to Georgia and Los Angeles Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries in 2014-2015 were surveyed 7 months after their diagnosis. The individual most involved in each respondent's decision making (the key DSP) was surveyed. DSP engagement was measured across 3 domains: 1) informed about decisions, 2) involved in decisions, and 3) aware of patient preferences. Patient decision appraisal included subjective decision quality (SDQ) and deliberation. This study evaluated bivariate associations with chi-square tests between domains of DSP engagement and independent DSP variables. Analysis of variance and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare domains of DSP engagement with patient decision appraisal. Results In all, 2502 patients (68% response rate) and 1203 eligible DSPs (70% response rate) responded. Most DSPs were husbands/partners or daughters, were white, and were college graduates. Husbands/partners were more likely to be more informed, involved, and aware (all P values < .01). English- and Spanish-speaking Latinos had a higher extent of (P = .02) but lower satisfaction with involvement (P < .01). A highly informed DSP was associated with higher odds of patient-reported SDQ (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.08; P = .03). A highly aware DSP was associated with higher odds of patient-reported deliberation (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.47; P < .01). Conclusions In this population-based study, informal DSPs were engaged with and positively contributed to patients' treatment decision making. To improve decision quality, future interventions should incorporate DSPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据