4.2 Article

Habitat type influences parasite load in Algerian Psammodromus (Psammodromus algirus) lizards

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 172-180

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2018-0145

关键词

populations; ectoparasites; hemoparasites; habitat degradation; Algerian Psammodromus; Psammodromus algirus

类别

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia e Innovacion [MINECO-CGL2014-53523-P]
  2. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/109182/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how habitat type and deterioration may affect parasitism is important in assessing the effects of human-induced environmental change on host-parasite dynamics. In this study, we examined inter-population differences in parasite load in the Mediterranean lizard Psammodromus algirus (Linnaeus, 1758). We analyzed prevalence and intensity of infection by blood parasites and ectoparasites in two populations separated by a 400 m elevational gradient and with different habitat types that also differed in the degree of human alteration. We also compared data obtained from the same populations 10 years later to assess whether there have been temporary changes in parasite loads. Results showed that prevalence and intensity of blood parasites were higher in the deteriorated lowland holm oak forest population than in the well-preserved upland oak forest. In contrast, the prevalence and intensity of infection by Ixodes Latreille, 1795 ticks was higher in the upland oak forest population. Individuals from the lowland population were in poorer condition. Intensities of infection by blood parasites and ectoparasites have decreased significantly from 2005-2006 to 2016 in both populations. Our results suggest that inter-population differences in parasite load may be explained by differences in habitat characteristics. This study contributes to the identification of ecosystems and habitats that are most sensitive to prevalence and intensity of infection by parasites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据