4.4 Review

Development and Application of New Iridium Catalysts for Efficient Dehydrogenative Reactions of Organic Molecules

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 344-351

出版社

CHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.20180301

关键词

Iridium; Functional Ligand; Dehydrogenation

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19750075, 22550098, 25105732, 26620153, 26288047, 16H01018, 18H04255]
  2. UBE Industries Foundation
  3. Asahi Glass Foundation
  4. Tonen General Sekiyu Research/Development Encouragement & Scholarship Foundation
  5. Mitsubishi Foundation
  6. Research Foundation for the Electrotechnology of Chubu
  7. ENEOS Hydrogen Trust Fund
  8. Yashima Environment Technology Foundation
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26288047, 26620153, 18H04255, 25105732, 22550098, 19750075, 16H01018] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, development and application of iridium catalysts for dehydrogenative reactions including (1) dehydrogenative oxidation of alcohols into carbonyl compounds, (2) hydrogen storage systems based on the reversible interconversion between saturated N-heterocycles and unsaturated aromatic N-heterocycles by catalytic dehydrogenation and hydrogenation, and (3) efficient hydrogen production from methanolwater solution under very mild conditions, are reported. The key point of the study described in this paper is designing a series of catalysts based on the cooperation of a metal center and a functional ligand, which is based on reversible transformation of two catalytically active species (an iridium species bearing a-pyridonate-based functional ligand and an iridium species bearing a-hydroxypyridine-based functional ligand). Various novel iridium catalysts have been synthesized and a number of catalytic dehydrogenative reactions have been developed. In addition to providing new methods for organic synthetic chemistry, these investigations would contribute to the fields of environmental chemistry and sustainable energy research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据