4.5 Article

Multivariate machine learning models for prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using MRI features: a study using an independent validation set

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 173, 期 2, 页码 455-463

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4990-9

关键词

Pathologic complete response; Neoadjuvant therapy; Breast cancer; Breast cancer MRI; MRI radiomics; Machine learning; Logistic regression; Support vector machines

类别

资金

  1. North Carolina Biotechnology Center [2016-BIG-6520]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1R01EB021360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo determine whether a multivariate machine learning-based model using computer-extracted features of pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer patients.MethodsInstitutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study of 288 breast cancer patients at our institution who received NAT and had a pre-treatment breast MRI. A comprehensive set of 529 radiomic features was extracted from each patient's pre-treatment MRI. The patients were divided into equal groups to form a training set and an independent test set. Two multivariate machine learning models (logistic regression and a support vector machine) based on imaging features were trained to predict pCR in (a) all patients with NAT, (b) patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and (c) triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (TN/HER2+) patients who had NAT. The multivariate models were tested using the independent test set, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated.ResultsOut of the 288 patients, 64 achieved pCR. The AUC values for predicting pCR in TN/HER+ patients who received NAT were significant (0.707, 95% CI 0.582-0.833, p<0.002).ConclusionsThe multivariate models based on pre-treatment MRI features were able to predict pCR in TN/HER2+ patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据