4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

scdNet: a computational tool for single-cell differential network analysis

期刊

BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-018-0652-0

关键词

Differential network analysis; Gene regulatory networks; Single-cell RNA-Seq

资金

  1. Taichung Veterans General Hospital
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST104-2314-B-038-044]
  3. National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan [NHRI-EX107-10710BC]
  4. NCI Cancer Center Shared Resources [NIH-NCI P30CA54174]
  5. NIH [CTSA 1UL1RR025767-01]
  6. CPRIT [RP160732]
  7. San Antonio Life Science Institute (SALSI Postdoctoral Research Fellowship 2018)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) is an emerging technology that has revolutionized the research of the tumor heterogeneity. However, the highly sparse data matrices generated by the technology have posed an obstacle to the analysis of differential gene regulatory networks.ResultsAddressing the challenges, this study presents, as far as we know, the first bioinformatics tool for scRNA-Seq-based differential network analysis (scdNet). The tool features a sample size adjustment of gene-gene correlation, comparison of inter-state correlations, and construction of differential networks. A simulation analysis demonstrated the power of scdNet in the analyses of sparse scRNA-Seq data matrices, with low requirement on the sample size, high computation efficiency, and tolerance of sequencing noises. Applying the tool to analyze two datasets of single circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of prostate cancer and early mouse embryos, our data demonstrated that differential gene regulation plays crucial roles in anti-androgen resistance and early embryonic development.ConclusionsOverall, the tool is widely applicable to datasets generated by the emerging technology to bring biological insights into tumor heterogeneity and other studies. MATLAB implementation of scdNet is available at https://github.com/ChenLabGCCRI/scdNet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据