相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients
C. Parai et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2018)
The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery
Ivar M. Austevoll et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2017)
Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study)
Erland Hermansen et al.
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2017)
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Peter Forsth et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Zoher Ghogawala et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a satisfactory symptom state in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study
Miranda L. van Hooff et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2016)
What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
Tamas F. Fekete et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2016)
Evidence and practice in spine registries A systematic review, and recommendations for future design of registries
Miranda L. Van Hooff et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2015)
Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
A Review of the Use of the Number Needed to Treat to Evaluate the Efficacy of Analgesics
Nathaniel Katz et al.
JOURNAL OF PAIN (2015)
Could Less Be More When Assessing Patient-Rated Outcome in Spinal Stenosis?
Anne F. Mannion et al.
SPINE (2015)
Comparing Cost-effectiveness of X-Stop With Minimally Invasive Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Randomized Controlled Trial
Greger Lonne et al.
SPINE (2015)
Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions
Nathaniel P. Katz et al.
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH (2015)
Patients' ratings of global perceived change during 2 years were strongly influenced by the current health status
Lars Grovle et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Can we define success criteria for lumbar disc surgery? Estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures
Tore Solberg et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2013)
Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries Clinical article
Leah Y. Carreon et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2013)
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Derk A. van Kampen et al.
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH (2013)
Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis? A TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY INVOLVING 5390 PATIENTS
P. Forsth et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2013)
A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain
Manuela L. Ferreira et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
Alexis Wright et al.
JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY (2012)
Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods
Lori D. McLeod et al.
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status
Steven J. Kamper et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Thresholds for Health-related Quality of Life measures: reality testing
Steven D. Glassman et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
Robert J. Gatchel et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
William C. Watters et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2009)
Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis
Steven D. Glassman et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2008)
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Robert H. Dworkin et al.
JOURNAL OF PAIN (2008)
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
James N. Weinstein et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2008)
Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain - Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo et al.
SPINE (2008)
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
William C. Watters et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2008)
Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales
Anne G. Copay et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2008)
Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
James N. Weinstein et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2007)
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2007)
Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial
Antti Malmivaara et al.
SPINE (2007)
Clinically important outcomes in low back pain
RWJG Ostelo et al.
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY (2005)
Sufficiently important difference: Expanding the framework of clinical significance
B Barrett et al.
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2005)
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index
M Grotle et al.
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE (2003)
The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures
PL Hudak et al.
SPINE (2000)
Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders - Summary and general recommendations
C Bombardier
SPINE (2000)
分享论文
