Level and variation on quality of care in China: a cross-sectional study for the acute myocardial infarction patients in tertiary hospitals in Beijing

BackgroundQuality of care (QoC) attracts global concerns when unsafe and misuse of healthcare wastes resources and endangers people's health, especially in low- and middle-income countries. However, little is known about quality of care delivered in China. This study was intended to gauge the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients in Beijing and identify the quality gaps across tertiary hospitals.MethodsOne thousand two hundred twenty eight patients, covered by Employee Essential Health Insurance Scheme and diagnosed of AMI, was sampled from 14 large comprehensive hospitals in Beijing, China. Chart review study was conducted through the discharge data and medical records of inpatients to evaluate 6 quality outcomes of interest, including the use of aspirin, beta blocker, and statin at discharge; use of aspirin within 24h at arrival; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD); percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) within 90min at arrival.ResultsOf the 1228 subjects, the mean age was 60.8 (11.8 SD) years and 83.0% were male. The overall medication prescribed was highly compliant with the clinical guidelines (97.0% [95% CI 96.8-97.2] for aspirin and 96.3% [95% CI 96.0-96.5] for statin), except for beta-blocker (83.6% [95% CI 83.0-84.1]) and ACEI/ARB use (61.4% [95% CI 60.7-62.2]). More than half of eligible patients did not receive appropriate PCI therapy (44.0% [95% CI 42.5-45.4]). Great variations across hospitals was observed in aspirin within 24h and beta-blocker at discharge (P<0.001), and the risk-adjusted results remained robust.ConclusionUnderuse of recommended treatment and significant variations of quality were found for AMI patients across tertiary hospitals in Beijing. It raised great concerns on poorer quality of care in other less-developed areas with less medical resources. Practical actions are needed in reducing quality gaps to ensure the delivery of quality care.