4.2 Article

The impact of peppermint oil on the irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis of the pooled clinical data

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2409-0

关键词

Irritable bowel syndrome; IBS; Peppermint oil; Global symptom relief; Abdominal pain; Meta-analysis; PRISMA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPeppermint oil (PO) has intrinsic properties that may benefit patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms. The study objective was to determine the effect of peppermint oil in the treatment of the IBS.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE (Ovid), and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PO for IBS. We appraised the eligible studies by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We performed random-effects meta-analysis on primary outcomes including global improvement in IBS symptoms and abdominal pain. A PRISMA-compliant study protocol is registered in PROSPERO Register [2016, CRD42016050917].ResultsTwelve randomized trials with 835 patients were included. For global symptom improvement, the risk ratio (RR) from seven RCTs for the effect of PO (n=253) versus placebo (n=254) on global symptoms was 2.39 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93, 2.97], I-2=0%, z=7.93 (p<0.00001). Regarding abdominal pain, the RR from six RCTs for the effect of PO (n=278) versus placebo (n=278) was 1.78 [95% CI: 1.43, 2.20], I-2=0%, z=5.23 (p<0.00001). Overall, there were no differences in the reported adverse effects: PO (32 events, 344 total, 9.3%) versus placebo (20 events, 327 total, 6.1%) for eight RCTs; RR 1.40 [95% CI: 0.87, 2.26] I-2=0%, z=1.39 (p=0.16). The number needed to treat with PO to prevent one patient from having persistent symptoms was three for global symptoms and four for abdominal pain.ConclusionsIn the most comprehensive meta-analysis to date, PO was shown to be a safe and effective therapy for pain and global symptoms in adults with IBS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据