4.6 Article

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large institution-based cohort study from an endemic area

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5236-2

关键词

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; advanced; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; Prognosis

类别

资金

  1. Health and Medical Collaborative Innovation Project of Guangzhou City, China [201604020003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81402532]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundFindings remain unclear whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) detrimentally affects advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) prognosis. We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR in patients with NPC based on a large-scale cohort from an endemic area.MethodsWe selected patients retrospectively from a cohort examining long-term cancer outcomes following diagnosis. Neutrophil counts and lymphocyte counts were assessed prior to treatment. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare survival outcomes. Additionally, Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to carry out univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsBetween October 2009 and August 2012, we enrolled 1550 consecutive NPC patients staged II-IVB. The median value of NLR was 2.27 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.71-3.12). Determined by operating characteristic curve using overall survival (OS) as an endpoint, the cutoff value for NLR was 2.50. At 5years, NLR >2.50 was associated with inferior OS (90.3% vs 82.5%; P<0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, 89.4% vs 85.0%; P=0.014), and progression-free survival (PFS, 80.9% vs 76.5%; P=0.031) than NLR 2.50. In multivariate analysis, NLR was found to be a significant prognostic factor for OS (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 131-2.24; P<0.001), DMFS (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.10-1.92; P=0.009), and PFS (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.59; P=0.021).ConclusionPretreatment NLR independently affects survival. Our findings suggest that NLR measurements will be of great clinical significance in the management of NPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据