4.6 Article

Are comorbidities associated with long-term survival of lung cancer? A population-based cohort study from French cancer registries

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5000-7

关键词

Lung cancer; Prognostic factors; Net survival; Histological type; Population-based study

类别

资金

  1. Institut National du Cancer, Paris, France [0612-3D1514-14]
  2. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundSurvival rates of lung cancer remains poor and the impact of comorbidities on the prognosis is discussed. The objective of this study was to assess if the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with 8-year survival rates by histological type.MethodsA cohort study was conducted using randomly selected cases from 10 French cancer registries. Net survival rates were computed using the Pohar-Perme estimator of the net cumulative rate. Three Cox models were independently built for adenocarcinomas, squamous cell and small cell cancers to estimate prognostic factors including CCI grade.ResultsA total of 646 adenocarcinomas, 524 squamous cell and 233 small cell cancers were included in the analysis. The net 8-year survival rate ranged from 12.6% (95% CI: 9.8-15.4%) for adenocarcinomas and 13.4% (95% CI: 10.1-16.7%) for squamous cell carcinomas, to 3.7% (95% CI: 1.1-6.3%) for small cell cancers. Observed and net survival rates decreased for CCI grades 3 for all histological group considered.After adjustment for sex, age group, stage and diagnostic mode, CCI grades 1 (HR=1.6 [95% CI: 1.1-2.3]), 2 (HR=1.7 [95% CI: 1.1-2.7]) and3 (HR=2.7 [95% CI: 1.7-4.4]) were associated with lower survival rates only for small cell cancers.ConclusionAfter adjustment for age, sex, stage and diagnostic mode, the presence of comorbidity based on CCI grades 1-2 and3 was associated with lower survival rates for small cell cancers whereas no differences were observed for adenocarcinomas and squamous cell cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据