4.6 Article

pblat: a multithread blat algorithm speeding up aligning sequences to genomes

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2597-8

关键词

Sequence alignment; Genome annotation; Parallel computing; Cluster computing

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1201200, 2016YFB0201700, 2017YFC0908400]
  2. International Collaboration Program for Proteome Biological Big Data and Standard System [2014DFB30030]
  3. Postdoctoral Fellowship of Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe blat is a widely used sequence alignment tool. It is especially useful for aligning long sequences and gapped mapping, which cannot be performed properly by other fast sequence mappers designed for short reads. However, the blat tool is single threaded and when used to map whole genome or whole transcriptome sequences to reference genomes this program can take days to finish, making it unsuitable for large scale sequencing projects and iterative analysis. Here, we present pblat (parallel blat), a parallelized blat algorithm with multithread and cluster computing support, which functions to rapidly fine map large scale DNA/RNA sequences against genomes.ResultsThe pblat algorithm takes advantage of modern multicore processors and significantly reduces the run time with the number of threads used. pblat utilizes almost equal amount of memory as when running blat. The results generated by pblat are identical with those generated by blat. The pblat tool is easy to install and can run on Linux and Mac OS systems. In addition, we provide a cluster version of pblat (pblat-cluster) running on computing clusters with MPI support.Conclusionpblat is open source and free available for non-commercial users. It is easy to install and easy to use. pblat and pblat-cluster would facilitate the high-throughput mapping of large scale genomic and transcript sequences to reference genomes with both high speed and high precision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据