4.6 Article

Inhibitory effect of high leucine concentration on α-amylase secretion by pancreatic acinar cells: possible key factor of proteasome

期刊

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20181455

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31472122, 31672451]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study aimed to investigate whether leucine affects the pancreatic exocrine by controlling the antisecretory factor (AF) and cholecystokinin receptor (CCKR) expression as well as the proteasome activity in pancreatic acinar cells of dairy calves. The pancreatic acinar cells were isolated from newborn Holstein bull calves and cultured using the Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/nutrient mixture F12 Ham's liquid (DMEM/F12). There were six treatments of leucine dosage including 0 (control), 0.23, 0.45, 1.35, 4.05, and 12.15 mM, respectively. After culture for 3 h, the samples were collected for subsequent analysis. As the leucine concentration increased from 0 to 1.35 mM, the a-amylase activity in media decreased significantly (P<0.05), while further increase in leucine concentration did not show any decrease in alpha-amylase activity. Addition of leucine inhibited (P<0.05) the expression of AF and CCKR, and decreased the activity of proteasome (P<0.05) by 76%, 63%, 24%, 7%, and 9%, respectively. Correlation analysis results showed alpha-amylase secretion was negatively correlated with leucine concentration (P<0.01), and positively correlated with proteasome activity (P<0.01) and the expression of CCK1R (P<0.01) and AF (P<0.05). The biggest regression coefficient was showed between alpha-amylase activity and proteasome (0.7699, P<0.001). After inhibition of proteasome byMG-132, low dosage leucine decreased (P<0.05) the activity of proteasome and alpha-amylase, as well as the expression of CCK1R. In conclusion, we demonstrated that the high-concentration leucine induced decrease in alpha-amylase release was mainly by decreasing proteasome activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据