4.7 Article

Involvement of AMPK activation in the inhibition of hepatic gluconeogenesis by Ficus carica leaf extract in diabetic mice and HepG2 cells

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 188-194

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.077

关键词

Ficus carica; AMP-activated protein kinase; Diabetes mellitus; Gluconeogenesis; Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; Glucose-6-phosphatase

资金

  1. National Health and Family Planning Commission for Scientific Research [WKJ-FJ-13]
  2. Key Personnel Training Program for Young and Middle-aged Talents in Fujian Health System [2015-ZQN-ZD-23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to explore the possible mechanisms of Ficus carica leaf (FCL) extract in suppressing hepatic gluconeogenesis in diabetic mice. Diabetic mice (streptozotocin-induced) received 1 g/kg of FCL extract twice a day for 6 weeks. Fasting blood glucose levels were measured and a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test was conducted. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase), and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha) expression was examined. HepG2 hepatocytes were treated with FCL extract and an AMPK inhibitor (compound C) or agonist (AICAR), and PEPCK, G6pase, PGC-1 alpha, AMPK, forkhead transcription factor O1 (FOXO1), and hepatic nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4 alpha) expression was determined. The results showed that FCL extract inhibited the expression of PEPCK and G6Pase in the liver of diabetic mice and HepG2 hepatocytes. FCL extract activated AMPK and decreased PGC-1 alpha, HNF4 alpha, and FOXO1 expression. The AMPK inhibitor attenuated those effects through inhibiting gluconeogenesis, while the AMPK agonist partially enhanced gluconeogenesis. In conclusion, FCL extract inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis via activation of AMPK and down-regulation of gluconeogenic enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据