4.7 Article

Spatially and temporally targeted suppression of despotic noisy miners has conservation benefits for highly mobile and threatened woodland birds

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 343-351

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.006

关键词

Precautionary principle; Adaptive management; Threatened species; Population monitoring; Invasive species; Australia

资金

  1. Coal and Allied (RioTinto plc)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactive effects of habitat loss and interspecific competition are major threats to global biodiversity. Managing despotic competitors in modified landscapes is a conservation priority, but implementing actions to benefit rare and highly mobile species is challenging. In Australia, overabundance of hyperaggressive noisy miners following woodland fragmentation and degradation is a key threatening process given their impact on songbirds including the nomadic, critically endangered regent honeyeater. Recent studies have found rapid noisy miner recolonization following their experimental removal, questioning the efficacy of miner removal as a conservation measure. We estimated the relative habitat saturation of noisy miners at a hotspot of threatened bird diversity. We then experimentally removed 350 noisy miners and assessed the effect of this removal on subsequent noisy miner abundance, relative to a control area. We monitored the occurrence of noisy miners near regent honeyeater nests and modelled the effect of noisy miner removal on songbird populations. Noisy miner removal significantly decreased noisy miner abundance throughout the breeding season, when 15-18 regent honeyeaters nested in the miner removal area. Songbird abundance and species richness increased significantly in the miner removal area, relative to the control area. We provide a rare example of how spatially and temporally targeted preventative action can reduce threats for nomadic and highly threatened species during breeding and prevent ongoing avian diversity loss more broadly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据