4.6 Article

Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on phosphorus cycling in organic soil horizons of temperate forests

期刊

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 167-181

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-018-0511-5

关键词

Chronic nitrogen deposition; Exoenzymes; Long-term experiments; Nutrient mineralization; Phosphatase; Soil stoichiometry

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SP 1389/4-1, SPP 1685]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) Program
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1237491] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition is expected to impair phosphorus (P) nutrition of temperate forest ecosystems. We examined N and P cycling in organic soil horizons of temperate forests exposed to long-term N addition in the northeastern USA and Scandinavia. We determined N and P concentrations, enzyme activities and net N and P mineralization rates in organic soil horizons of two deciduous (Harvard Forest, Bear Brook) and two coniferous (Klosterhede, Gardsjon) forests which had received experimental inorganic N addition between 25 and 150kgNha(-1)year(-1) for more than 25years. Long-term N addition increased the activity of phosphatase (+180%) and the activity of carbon (C)- and N-acquiring enzymes (cellobiohydrolase: +70%, chitinase: +25%). Soil N enrichment increased the N:P ratio of organic soil horizons by up to 150%. In coniferous organic soil horizons, net N and P mineralization were small and unaffected by N addition. In deciduous organic soil horizons, net N and P mineralization rates were significantly higher than at the coniferous sites, and N addition increased net N mineralization by up to 290%. High phosphatase activities concomitant with a 40% decline in P stocks of deciduous organic soil horizons indicate increased plant P demand. In summary, projected future global increases in atmospheric N deposition may induce P limitation in deciduous forests, impairing temperate forest growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据