4.7 Article

The role of posttranslational modifications of α-synuclein and LRRK2 in Parkinson's disease: Potential contributions of environmental factors

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.11.017

关键词

alpha-Synuclein; LRRK2; Parkinson's disease; Manganese; Posttranslational modifications

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [ROl ES024756, RIM ES10563, 1R03 ES024849, ROl ES07331, 1R21 ES025415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the most prevalent movement disorder. PD is characterized by dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the substantia nigra, but its etiology has yet to be established. Among several genetic variants contributing to PD pathogenesis, alpha-synuclein and leucine-rich repeat kinase (LRRK2) are widely associated with neuropathological phenotypes in familial and sporadic PD. alpha-Synuclein and LRRK2 found in Lewy bodies, a pathogenic hallmark of PD, are often posttranslationally modified. As posttranslational modifications (PTMs) are key processes in regulating the stability, localization, and function of proteins, PTMs have emerged as important modulators of alpha-synuclein and LRRK2 pathology. Aberrant PTMs altering phosphorylation, ubiquitination, nitration and truncation of these proteins promote PD pathogenesis, while other PTMs such as sumoylation may be protective. Although the causes of many aberrant PTMs are unknown, environmental risk factors may contribute to their aberrancy. Environmental toxicants such as rotenone and paraquat have been shown to interact with these proteins and promote their abnormal PTMs. Notably, manganese (Mn) exposure leads to a PD-like neurological disorder referred to as manganism-and induces pathogenic PTMs of alpha-synuclein and LRRK2. In this review, we highlight the role of PTMs of alpha-synuclein and LRRK2 in PD pathogenesis and discuss the impact of environmental risk factors on their aberrancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据