4.5 Article

pH dependent membrane binding of the Solanum tuberosum plant specific insert: An in silico study

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1860, 期 12, 页码 2608-2618

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.10.001

关键词

Saposin-like protein; Molecular dynamics; Membrane interactions; Protein-membrane interactions; Solanum tuberosum

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Solanum tuberosum plant-specific insert (StPSI) has been shown to possess potent antimicrobial activity against both human and plant pathogens. Furthermore, in vitro, the StPSI is capable of fusing phospholipid vesicles, provided the conditions of net anionic vesicle charge and acidic pH are met. Constant pH replicaexchange simulations indicate several acidic residues on the dimer have highly perturbed pK(a)s ( < 3.0; E15, D28, E85 & E100) due to involvement in salt bridges. After setting the pH of the system to either 3.0 or 7.4, all-atom simulations provided details of the effect of pH on secondary structural elements, particularly in the previously unresolved crystallographic structure of the loop section. Coarse-grained dimer-bilayer simulations demonstrated that at pH 7.4, the dimer had no affinity for neutral or anionic membranes over the course of 1 mu s simulations. Conversely, at pH 3.0 two binding modes were observed. Mode 1 is mediated primarily via strong N-terminal interactions on one monomer only, whereas in mode 2, N- and C-terminal residues of one monomer and numerous polar and basic residues on the second monomer, particularly in the third helix, participate in membrane interactions. Mode 2 was accompanied by re-orientation of the dimer to a more vertical position with respect to helices 1 and 4, positioning the dimer for membrane interactions. These results offer the first examination at near-atomic resolution of residues mediating the StPSI-membrane interactions, and allow for the postulation of a possible fusion mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据