4.6 Article

A novel morphometry system automatically assessing the growth and regeneration of intestinal organoids

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.10.181

关键词

Morphometry system; Intestinal organoid; Growth; Survival; Regeneration

资金

  1. Chongqing Natural Science Foundation [cstc2018jcyj-yszxX0004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472916, 81872556]
  3. Fund from PLA [AWS13J002, AWS17J007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As compared with 2D cell line cultures, 3D intestinal organoids are better at maximally recapitulating the physiological features of stem cells in vivo. However, the complex 3D structure is an obstacle which must be objectively and automatically evaluated to assess colony growth and regeneration. Meanwhile, no internal standard currently exists for evaluating the size of heterogeneities in organoids or defining those regenerating colonies. Herein, we developed a simple morphometry system to image MTT-stained organoids. The growth curve of organoids can be automatically generated based upon analyzing the integrated optical density using software. Referencing the definition standards of in vivo regenerating crypts, the perimeters of crypts cultured 24 h after seeding were selected as an Organoid Unit to further evaluate colony survival rate and colony size heterogeneities after exposure to varying doses of irradiation. Moreover, the morphometry-based quantification data collected confirmed other findings associated with radiation sensitizing effects of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) inhibitor and the radiation protective effect of IL-22. In summary, the novel organoid morphometry system combined with a new internal reference is a practical means for standardizing assessment of growth, survival and regeneration of intestinal organoid colonies. This method has promise to facilitate drug screens in intestinal and other organoid systems. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据