4.5 Article

Fatty liver haemorrhagic syndrome occurrence in laying hens: impact of production system

期刊

AVIAN PATHOLOGY
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 25-34

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2018.1538550

关键词

Laying hens; cage egg production; metabolic disease; fatty liver haemorrhagic syndrome; body weight

资金

  1. Australian Egg Corporation Limited (AECL)
  2. Poultry CRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surveys were conducted with cage and alternative layer production systems to assess the prevalence of fatty liver haemorrhagic syndrome (FLHS). Commercial caged laying hens of different ages from three farms in Queensland were monitored for three months. The mortality rate of flocks ranged from 0.8% (the youngest flock) to 11.6% (the oldest flock). Six hundred and fifty-one birds were necropsied, and approximately 40% of hens died due to FLHS. Hens kept in cages in a controlled environment shed, were at a similar risk of developing FLHS to hens kept in naturally controlled sheds, however, the heavier birds in a flock were more likely to have the condition than lighter birds. In another study, layer flocks kept in cage, barn and free-range housing systems at the University of Queensland facility, were monitored for 50 weeks. Data from necropsies and performance records showed no significant differences in mortality rates between the housing systems (6.1%, 6.4% and 5.8%, for cages, barns and free-range, respectively), but the cause of mortality was different. In cages, 74% of necropsied hens died due to FLHS. In the other systems, only 0-5% of dead hens were diagnosed with the condition. These results are in agreement with previous Australian and overseas findings which have shown that FLHS is one of the main causes of hen death in caged flocks. Factors associated with husbandry practices in different production systems, such as restricted movement, increased production and temperature variations, influence hepatic lipid metabolism and predispose hens to FLHS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据