4.6 Article

Carbon and oxygen in metal-poor halo stars

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 622, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834480

关键词

radiative transfer; stars: abundances; stars: late-type; stars: Population II

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council [2015-004153]
  3. Marie Sklodowska Curie Actions [INCA 600398]
  4. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF106]
  5. Australian Research Council [FL110100012, DP150100250]
  6. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D) [CE170100013]
  7. Swedish Research Council
  8. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  9. ESO programmes [67.D-0106, 73.D-0024]
  10. Australian Government through the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) under the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon and oxygen are key tracers of the Galactic chemical evolution; in particular, a reported upturn in [C/O] towards decreasing [O/H] in metal-poor halo stars could be a signature of nucleosynthesis by massive Population III stars. We reanalyse carbon, oxygen, and iron abundances in 39 metal-poor turn-off stars. For the first time, we take into account 3D hydrodynamic effects together with departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) when determining both the stellar parameters and the elemental abundances, by deriving effective temperatures from 3D non-LTE H beta profiles, surface gravities from Gaia parallaxes, iron abundances from 3D LTE Fe ii equivalent widths, and carbon and oxygen abundances from 3D non-LTE C-I and O-I equivalent widths. We find that [C/Fe] stays flat with [Fe/H], whereas [O/Fe] increases linearly up to 0.75 dex with decreasing [Fe/H] down to -3.0 dex. Therefore [C/O] monotonically decreases towards decreasing [C/H], in contrast to previous findings, mainly because the non-LTE e ff ects for O i at low [Fe/H] are weaker with our improved calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据