4.4 Article

Factors associated with post-relapse survival in patients with recurrent cervical cancer: the value of the inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 299, 期 4, 页码 1055-1062

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4993-0

关键词

Cervical cancer; Relapse; Recurrence; Glasgow Prognostic Score; Prognosis

资金

  1. Medical University of Vienna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to assess the value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) as a prognostic tool for predicting post-relapse survival (PRS) in patients with recurrent cervical cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the data of 116 patients with recurrent cervical cancer in whom serologic biomarkers had been assessed at the time of relapse. The GPS was calculated as follows: patients with elevated serum C-reactive protein levels and hypoalbuminemia were allocated a score of 2, and those with 1 or no abnormal value were allocated a score of 1 and 0, respectively. To assess the association between factors including the GPS and PRS, we performed uni- and multivariate survival analyzes.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 20.9months from recurrence, a 5-year PRS rate of 25% (SE 4.7%) was observed. Only in 29.8% of the patients, recurrence was limited to the pelvis. In uni- and multivariate survival analyzes, the GPS [HR 1.6 (95% CI 0.9-2.4), p=0.01], a history of radiation therapy as part of initial treatment [HR 2.7 (95% CI 1.1-6.9), p=0.03], and the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or multiple sites of relapse [HR 4.2 (95% CI 1.9-9.3), p<0.001] were associated with shorter PRS. The GPS correlated with higher squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels (p=0.001), shorter median PRS (p=0.009), and less intensive treatment for relapse (p=0.02).ConclusionsA higher GPS at the time of relapse, a history of radiation therapy, and the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or multiple sites of relapse are independently associated with shorter PRS in patients with recurrent cervical cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据