4.7 Article

Easy synthesis of multi-shelled ZnO hollow spheres and their conversion into hedgehog-like ZnO hollow spheres with superior rate performance for lithium ion batteries

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 464, 期 -, 页码 472-478

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.115

关键词

Synthesis; Hedgehog-like ZnO; Lithium ion batteries; Nanostructure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21806129, 51872238, 51407134]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590619]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016EEQ28]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102018zy045]
  5. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JQ5116]
  6. Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Research Project
  7. State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment [EIPE14107]
  8. Thousand Talents Plan
  9. World-Class University and Discipline
  10. Taishan Scholar's Advantageous and Distinctive Discipline Program of Shandong Province
  11. World-Class Discipline Program of Shandong Province
  12. [51521065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, uniform mull-shelled ZnO hollow spheres were synthesized, especially hedgehog-like and triple-shelled ZnO hollow spheres were synthesized for the first time by a simple hydrothermal method capable of controlling the number of internal multishells, which are achieved by controlling the calcination process. Used as anodes for lithium ion batteries, the hedgehog-like ZnO hollow spheres show excellent rate capacity, good cycling performance, and high initial specific capacity. A superior capacity, up to 109 mAh g(-1) with minimal irreversible capacity (i.e., coulomb efficiency of 99.1%) after 100 cycles is achieved at a current rate of 100 mA g(-1), and a capacity of 98.8 mAh g(-1) is obtained at a current rate of 1 A g(-1). However, a high discharge of 253.6 mA h g(-1) for the hedgehog-like ZnO hollow spheres can still be achieved when the current rate is reduced back to 100 mA g(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据