4.7 Article

Enhanced catalytic performance of a bio-templated TiO2 UV-Fenton system on the degradation of tetracycline

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 465, 期 -, 页码 223-231

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.145

关键词

UV-Fenton reaction; Photocatalytic; Bio-template; TiO2 nanosheets; Tetracycline degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomorphic TiO2 was successfully fabricated using maize straw as a template. The morphology and structure analysis revealed that the as-prepared TiO2 retained the original pore morphology of the maize straw material. The framework of the maize-straw-templated TiO2 (T-TiO2) consisted of a cubic grid structure derived from lamellar TiO2 nanosheets. The results of UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra and PL spectra revealed that the C-doping derived from maize straw template promoted the photoresponse properties of TiO2. Efficient hybrid AOPs (advanced oxidation processes) combining T-TiO2 photo-catalytic oxidation with a Fenton-like reaction for TC oxidation was first investigated, and then, the synergetic degradation effect was discussed in this article. As a result, the synergistic operation of the UV/Fenton/T-TiO2 photocatalytic hybrid process exhibited significant activity towards the degradation of TC (50 mg/L) over a wide pH range of 3.0-9.0 with a remarkably low iron ion dosage (1 mM). Moreover, the degradation kinetics can be well fitted by the pseudo-first order model, where a kinetic constant of 0.09378 min(-1) was achieved, substantially higher than those of the UV/Fenton/N-TiO2 (0.04419 min(-1)), UV/Fenton (0.03343 min(-1)), Fenton (0.0172 min(-1)), UV/H2O2 (0.01412 min(-1)), UV/T-TiO2 (0.00209 min(-1)) and UV (0.00027 min(-1)) systems. The high synergistic effect probably occurred because of (1) the high surface activity of T-TiO2 as photocatalyst, which yielded a remarkably enhanced optical absorption capacity for the lamellar structure, and (2) the efficient reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by the photoinduced electrons from T-TiO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据