4.7 Article

Efficient energy-stable schemes for the hydrodynamics coupled phase-field model

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 82-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.12.017

关键词

Phase-field modeling; Two-phase flows; Navier-Stokes equation; Scalar auxiliary variable; Energy stability

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2016ZX05011001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11771363, 91630204, 51661135011, 51490654, 51504276, 51304232]
  3. Innovative Project of the China University of Petroleum [YCX2017021]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [20720180003]
  5. Program for Prominent Young Talents in Fujian Province University
  6. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology [BAS/1/1351-01-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, several efficient and energy-stable semi-implicit schemes are presented for the Cahn-Hilliard phase-field model of two-phase incompressible flows. A scalar auxiliary variable (SAV) approach is implemented to solve the Cahn-Hilliard equation, while a splitting method based on pressure stabilization is used to solve the Navier-Stokes equation. At each time step, the schemes involve solving only a sequence of linear elliptic equations, and computations of the phase-field variable, velocity, and pressure are totally decoupled. A finite-difference method on staggered grids is adopted to spatially discretize the proposed time-marching schemes. We rigorously prove the unconditional energy stability for the semi-implicit schemes and the fully discrete scheme. Numerical results in both two and three dimensions are obtained, which demonstrate the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed schemes. Using our numerical schemes, we compare the SAV, invariant energy quadratization (IEQ), and stabilization approaches. Bubble rising dynamics and coarsening dynamics are also investigated in detail. The results demonstrate that the SAV approach is more accurate than the IEQ approach and that the stabilization approach is the least accurate among the three approaches. The energy stability of the SAV approach appears to be better than that of the other approaches at large time steps. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据