4.5 Article

Classification of ingestive-related cow behaviours using RumiWatch halter and neck-mounted accelerometers

期刊

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 9-16

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.12.003

关键词

Behaviors classification; Accelerometer; RumiWatch; Dairy cows; Machine learning; Internet-of-animals

资金

  1. imec (iMinds)
  2. Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new simple decision-tree (DT) algorithm was developed using the data from a neck-mounted accelerometer for real-time classification of feeding and ruminating behaviours of dairy cows. The performance of the DT was compared to that of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm and a RumiWatch noseband sensor and the effect of decreasing the sampling rate of the accelerometer on the classification accuracy of the developed algorithms was investigated. Ten multiparous dairy cows were used in this study. Each cow was fitted with a RumiWatch halter and an accelerometer attached to the cow's collar with both sensors programmed to log data at 10 Hz. Direct observations of the cows' behaviours were used as reference (baseline data). Results indicate that the two sensors have similar classification performances for the considered behavioural categories (i.e., feeding, ruminating, other activity), with an overall accuracy of 93% for the accelerometer with SVM, 90% for the accelerometer with DT, and 91% for the Rumiwatch sensor. The difference between the predicted and the observed ruminating time (in min/h) was less than 1 min. h (1.5% of the observed time) for the SVM and less than 2 min. h (2.8%) for both DT and the RumiWatch. Similarly, the difference in feeding time was 1.3 min. h (2.1%) for the SVM compared to 2.5 min. h (4.3%) and 2.4 min. h (4.1%) for both RumiWatch and DT, respectively. These preliminary findings illustrate the potential of the collar-mounted accelerometer to classify feeding and ruminating behaviours with accuracy measures comparable to the Rumiwatch noseband sensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据