4.7 Article

How Does Chemoradiotherapy Following Induction FOLFIRINOX Improve the Results in Resected Borderline or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma? An AGEO-FRENCH Multicentric Cohort

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 109-117

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6931-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. AGEO association
  2. FRENCH association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPatients with borderline (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) are often treated with induction FOLFIRINOX (FLX). However, the role of additional preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate its impact in patients who underwent resection after induction FLX.Patients and MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospective consecutive surgical BR or LA PAC patients after induction FLX in 23 French centers between November 2010 and December 2015, treated with or without preoperative additional CRT (FLX vs FLX+CRT groups).ResultsTwo hundred three patients were included (106 BR, 97 LA PAC). Median number of FLX cycles was 6 (range 1-30); 50% (n=102) of patients received additional CRT. Median duration between diagnosis and surgery was 5.4 and 8.7months (P=0.001) in the FLX and FLX+CRT group, respectively. The 90-day mortality, major complications, and pancreatic fistula rates were 4.4%, 17.7%, and 5.4%, respectively. After 45.1months follow-up, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 45.4months and 16.2months, respectively. Patients with additional CRT had higher R0 resection rate (89.2% vs 76.3%; P=0.017), ypN0 rate (76.2% vs 48.5%; P<0.001), and higher rate of pathologic major response (33.3% vs 12.9%; P=0.001). In the FLX+CRT group, patients had lower rate of locoregional relapse (28.3% vs 50.7%; P=0.004). Patients with additional CRT had longer OS than those receiving FLX alone (57.8 vs 35.5months; P=0.007).ConclusionsPathological results and survival data argue for interest in additional CRT. Prospective studies on an intention-to-treat basis are needed to confirm these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据