4.6 Article

In situ analyses of inorganic nutrient distribution in sweetcorn and maize kernels using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy

期刊

ANNALS OF BOTANY
卷 123, 期 3, 页码 543-556

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy189

关键词

Biofortification; calcium; iron; maize; manganese; nutrient distribution; phosphorus; sulphur; sweetcorn; synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM); Zea mays; zinc

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
  2. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) [SMCN/2012/029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims Understanding the spatial distribution of inorganic nutrients within edible parts of plant products helps biofortification efforts to identify and focus on specific uptake pathways and storage mechanisms. Methods Kernels of sweetcorn (Zea mays) variety 'High zeaxanthin 103146' and maize inbred line 'Thai Floury 2' were harvested at two different maturity stages, and the distributions of K, P, S, Ca, Zn, Fe and Mn were examined in situ using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy. Key Results The distribution of inorganic nutrients was largely similar between maize and sweetcorn, but differed markedly depending upon the maturity stage after further embryonic development. The micronutrients Zn, Fe and Mn accumulated primarily in the scutellum of the embryo during early kernel development, while trace amounts of these were found in the aleurone layer at the mature stage. Although P accumulated in the scutellum, there was no direct relationship between the concentrations of P and those of the micronutrients, compared with the linear trend between Zn and Fe concentrations. Conclusions This study highlights the important role of the embryo as a micronutrient reserve for sweetcorn and maize kernels, and the need to understand how biofortification efforts can further increase the inorganic nutrient concentration of the embryo for human consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据