4.8 Article

Fluorescence-Guided Cancer Diagnosis and Surgery by a Zero Cross Talk Ratiometric Near-Infrared γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase Fluorescent Probe

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 1056-1063

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04416

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775133]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2018JJ2385]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics Foundation [2017001]
  4. Hunan 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Engineering & Technology with Environmental Benignity and Effective Resource Utilization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to detect cancer early in an accurate and rapid fashion is of critical importance for cancer diagnosis and accurate resection in surgery. gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) is overexpressed in several human cancers, while maintaining a low expression in normal microenvironments, and thus is recognized as an important cancer biomarker. To date, rational design of a zero cross-talk ratiometric near-infrared (NIR) GGT fluorescent probe for efficient cancer diagnosis in various biological samples is still a big challenge. In this work, a zero cross-talk ratiometric NIR GGT fluorescent probe named Cy-GSH is developed. Cy-GSH shows high sensitivity to GGT, which is desired for early cancer diagnosis. Upon additional GGT, a large emission shift from 805 to 640 nm is observed, which is suitable for visualizing deeply located cancer in vivo. In addition, successful monitoring of GGT activity in blood, cells, tissues, and in vivo makes Cy-GSH possess great potential for the clinical cancer early diagnosis. Furthermore, accurately visualizing tumors and metastases in mouse models illuminates that the probe may be a convenient tool for fluorescence-guided cancer surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the strategy of a zero cross-talk ratiometric NIR GGT fluorescent probe for early cancer diagnosis and fluorescence-guided surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据