4.8 Article

Development of a Smart Fluorescent Sensor That Specifically Recognizes the c-MYC G-Quadruplex

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 3, 页码 2480-2487

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05298

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21672268, 21773313]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2015A030306004, 2016A030306038]
  3. Outstanding Youth Programme of Special Support Plan in Guangdong Province [2015TQ01R342]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Construction Foundation [2017B030314030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The specific sensing of an exact G-quadruplex structure by small molecules has never been reported. A fluorescent sensor based on the photoinduced electron transfer (PeT) mechanism provides possibilities for such specific, one-to-one recognition, indicated by fluorescence. We have rationally developed a PeT fluorescent sensor IZFL-2 by linking triarylimidazole and fluorescein moieties. IZFL-2 is a distinctive, smart sensor whose fluorescence is tunable by its molecular conformations. We then applied IZFL-2 to sensing G-quadruplexes and found that it could exactly distinguish the wild-type c-MYC G-quadruplex from other types of G-quadruplexes, as shown by the activation of its fluorescence. To understand this behavior, we performed various experiments, including fluorescence assays, absorption assays, and multiscale molecular dynamics simulations, to thoroughly investigate the optimal binding mode of IZFL-2 in the c-MYC G-quadruplex. Then, the corresponding HOMO-LUMO of IZFL-2 was analyzed, and the results demonstrated that the PeT process of IZFL-2 is suppressed only in the wild-type c-MYC G-quadruplex via specific loop interactions, which restores its fluorescence. To our knowledge, this smart molecule provides the first example of and new insights into the development of sensors specific for a particular G-quadruplex structure by utilizing intramolecular PeT-controlled fluorescence switching.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据