4.8 Article

Electrochemical-Signal-Amplification Strategy for an Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay with g-C3N4 as Tags

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 21, 页码 12930-12936

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03554

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575080, 21427808]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018JC017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Signal amplification for electrochemiluminescence (ECL) has conventionally been achieved by employing effective matrixes that can accelerate the electrochemical redox processes or carry more electrochemiluminophores. Herein, a convenient signal-amplification strategy was proposed for an ECL immunoassay with carboxylated g-C3N4 nanosheets (NSs) as tags and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as the model target via electrochemically pretreating the substrate: a glassy-carbon electrode (GCE) modified with a polymerized 2-aminoterephthalic acid (ATA) film (GCE/ATA). Bioconjugates of g-C3N4 NSs and the signal CEA antibody (Ab(2)) (i.e., g-C3N4 NS-Ab(2)) were immobilized on GCE/ATA via a sandwich immunoreaction to form GCE/ATA-Ab(1)-Ag-Ab(2)-NSs. Electrochemical-impedance spectroscopy and potential-resolved ECL characterization proved that GCE/ATA plays an important role in the electron-transfer resistance (Ret) of the GCE/ATA-Ab(1)-Ag-Ab(2)-NSs for ECL and that successively scanning GCE/ATA-Ab(1)-Ag-Ab(2)-NSs from 0 to -1.6 V in K2S2O8- and H2O2-containing medium could reduce the R-et and bring out 3.3-times-enhanced ECL at the 10th scan cycle compared with that of the 1st scan cycle, which was about 10.2 times the ECL of the GCE/ATA-Ab(1)-Ag-Ab(2)-NSs in medium containing merely K2S2O8. Inspired by this, direct and successive scanning of GCE/ATA in K2S2O8. and H2O2-containing medium was employed during fabrication, which dramatically reduced the Ret of GCE/ATA-Ab(1)-Ag-Ab(2)-NSs and brought out obviously enhanced ECL responses for selectively determining CEA from 0.1 pg/mL to 1 ng/mL, with a detection limit of 3 fg/mL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据