4.8 Article

Parallel Headspace Extraction onto Etched Sorbent Sheets Prior to Ambient-Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Automated, Trace-Level Volatile Analyses

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 22, 页码 13806-13813

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04465

关键词

-

资金

  1. EJ Gallo Winery
  2. NY Wine Grape Foundation Enology Program [I-34]
  3. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Award from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2017-67007-25940]
  4. National Science Foundation [ECCS-15420819]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Headspace (HS) extraction and preconcentration of volatiles by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) can improve the sensitivity and selectivity of ambient ionization-mass spectrometry approaches like direct analysis in real time (DART), but previous approaches to HS-SPME-DART-MS have been challenging to automate. This report describes the production of inexpensive, reusable solid-phase mesh-enhanced sorption from headspace (SPMESH) sheets by laser-etching mesh patterns into poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) sheets. Parallel headspace extraction of volatiles from multiple samples can be achieved by positioning the SPMESH sheets over multiwell plates and then attaching to a positioning stage for automated DART-MS quantitation. Using three representative odorants (3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine, linalool, and methyl anthranilate), we achieved mu g/L-ng/L detection limits with SPMESH-DART-MS, with the DART-MS step requiring only 17 min for 24 samples. Acceptable repeatability (24% or less day-to-day variation) and excellent recovery from a grape matrix (99-106%) could be achieved. Through use of a Teflon gasket and stainless steel spacers, cross-contamination between the headspaces of adjacent wells could be limited to roughly 1%. Optimum SPMESH extraction and desorption parameters were determined by response surface methodology. In summary, sheet-based SPMESH provides a sensitive, readily automated approach for coupling with DART-MS and achieving high-throughput trace-level volatile analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据