4.8 Article

HR-mu MAS NMR-Based Metabolomics: Localized Metabolic Profiling of a Garlic Clove with mu g Tissues

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 22, 页码 13736-13743

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04150

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-12-JSV5-0005, ANR-16-CE11-0023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The localization of metabolic profiles within a tissue sample is of particular interest when the sampling size is considerably small, i.e., in the order of a microgram (mu g) scale. Small sampling size is inevitable when the sample availability is limited, or when different metabolic profiles are suspected in small disparate sample regions. Capitalizing a recently introduced high-resolution micro-MAS probe (HR-mu MAS) for its capability of high-quality NMR data acquisition of mu g samples, this study explores the localized metabolic NMR profiling of a single garlic clove and compares the methodology and results with the standard HR-MAS. One advantage of HR-mu MAS is the feasibility of analyzing homogeneous mu g samples within a large heterogeneous tissue. As a result, the sampling mass (<0.5 mg) allows to selectively profile four homogeneous anatomical garlic regions by HR-mu MAS (skin, flesh, inner epidermis, and sprout), in contrast to three regions (skin, flesh, and core equivalent to inner epidermis and sprout) by HR-MAS, with a sampling mass of ca. 8 mg. Discriminant analysis was carried out to identify the significant variables in the different regions. It found a significant presence of fructose in both skin and flesh, while sucrose and glucose are predominant in the core. Among the garlic characteristic sulfur compounds, allicin is dominant in the core and allyl mercaptan in both skin and flesh. Quantification analysis was conducted and demonstrated its potential by quantifying metabolites at the mu g-level. This study offers an important basis for designing HR-mu MAS NMR-based metabolomics studies that can benefit from profiling mu g-scale samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据