4.6 Article

Variables of importance in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database predictive of heart transplant waitlist mortality

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 2067-2076

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15265

关键词

artificial organs; support devices; heart; ventricular assist devices; clinical research; practice; gender; health services and outcomes research; heart transplantation; cardiology; organ procurement and allocation; organ transplantation in general; patient survival; Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); waitlist management

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL141892]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prelisting variables essential for creating an accurate heart transplant allocation score based on survival are unknown. To identify these we studied mortality of adults on the active heart transplant waiting list in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from January 1, 2004 to August 31, 2015. There were 33 069 candidates awaiting heart transplantation: 7681 UNOS Status 1A, 13 027 Status 1B, and 12 361 Status 2. During a median waitlist follow-up of 4.3 months, 5514 candidates died. Variables of importance for waitlist mortality were identified by machine learning using Random Survival Forests. Strong correlates predicting survival were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum albumin, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ventricular assist device, mechanical ventilation, peak oxygen capacity, hemodynamics, inotrope support, and type of heart disease with less predictive variables including antiarrhythmic agents, history of stroke, vascular disease, prior malignancy, and prior tobacco use. Complex interactions were identified such as an additive risk in mortality based on renal function and serum albumin, and sex-differences in mortality when eGFR >40 mL/min/1.73 m. Most predictive variables for waitlist mortality are in the current tiered allocation system except for eGFR and serum albumin which have an additive risk and complex interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据