4.2 Article

Association of Antenatal Depression with Clinical Subtypes of Preterm Birth

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 567-573

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675646

关键词

pregnancy; depression; preterm birth

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA ES103321] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [ZIAES103321] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To estimate the association between antenatal depression and spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) relative to medically indicated preterm birth (MPTB). Study Design This was a secondary analysis of a nested case-control study of preterm birth (PTB). The exposure was a clinical diagnosis of antenatal depression. The outcome was PTB at <37 weeks classified as SPTB (spontaneous labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, and cervical shortening); and MPTB (preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction). Multinomial logistic regression models compared women without PTB versus MPTB and SPTB, adjusting for age, race, parity, tobacco use, insurance status, and prepregnancy body mass index, and history of PTB for SPTB. Results Among 443 pregnant women, 15.6% had an SPTB and 8.6% had an MPTB, and 16% were diagnosed with antenatal depression. Women with an SPTB were three times more likely to have antenatal depression compared with women without an SPTB (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-5.63). No significant association was identified between antenatal depression and MPTB (AOR: 1.77; 95% CI: 0.67-4.62). The association between antenatal depression and SPTB did not change after adjusting the aforementioned model for a history of PTB and antidepressant use. Conclusion Antenatal depression may differentially affect the risk of PTB through an increase in the odds of SPTB. These results have implications for future studies on prevention and treatment options for depression and PTB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据