4.4 Article

Identification of key genes and pathways in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps using bioinformatics analysis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 191-196

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.12.002

关键词

Chronic rhinosinusitis; Nasal polyps; Microarray; Bioinformatics analysis; Hub gene; Pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent inflammatory disease of yet unknown etiology. The purpose of this study was to uncover key genes and pathways related to the pathogenesis of CRSwNP via bioinformatics approaches. Materials and methods: The gene expression profile of GSE36830 extracted from Gene Expression Omnibus database was used to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between nasal polyp samples and control samples. Furthermore, functional and pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the clusterProfiler package in R language. In addition, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed by STRING database and functional modules were detected using Molecular Complex Dctection algorithm. Results: A total of 538 DEGs (326 up-regulated and 212 down-regulated) were identified. The most significantly enriched pathways for up-regulated and down-regulated genes were hematopoietic cell lineage and salivary secretion, respectively. Moreover, twenty hub genes with high connectivity degrees were selected from the PPI network, such as TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein (TYROBP), G protein subunit gamma 2 (GNG2), CCR7, and CCR3. Besides, six important modules were obtained, which were highly associated with chemokine signaling pathway, Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, complement and coagulation cascades, cell cycle, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Staphylococcus aureus infection. Conclusions: The results of this study may provide new insights into potential molecular mechanisms of CRSwNP. Nevertheless, further experiments are needed to confirm these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据