4.6 Article

Threshold of metabolic acidosis associated with newborn cerebral palsy: medical legal implications

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1107

关键词

acidosis; base deficit; brain injury; cerebral palsy; encephalopathy; hypoxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obstetricians and gynecologists belong to 1 of the medical specialties with the highest rate of litigation claims. Among birth injury cases, those cases with cerebral palsy outcomes account for litigation settlements or judgments often in the millions of dollars. In cases of potential perinatal asphyxia, a threshold level of metabolic acidosis (base deficit >= 12 mmol/L) is necessary to attribute neonatal encephalopathy to an intrapartum hypoxic event. With increasing duration or severity of a hypoxic stress resulting in metabolic acidosis, newborn infant umbilical artery base deficit increases. It may be alleged that, as base deficit levels increase beyond 12 mmol/L, there is an increased likelihood and severity of cerebral palsy. As a corollary, it may be claimed that an earlier delivery (by minutes) would reduce the base deficit and prevent or reduce the severity of cerebral palsy. This issue is of relevance to obstetricians as defendants, because retrospective expert analysis of cases may suggest that optimal management decisions would have resulted in an earlier delivery. In addressing the association of metabolic acidosis and cerebral palsy, base deficit should be measured as the extracellular component (base deficit(extracellular fluid)) rather than the commonly used base deficit(blood). Studies suggest that, beyond the base deficit threshold of 12mmol/L, the incidence and severity of cerebral palsy does not significantly increase (until >= 20 mmol/L), although the risk of neonatal death rises markedly. Thus, among most infants with hypoxia-associated neonatal encephalopathy, the occurrence of cerebral palsy is unlikely to be impacted by delivery time variation of few minutes, and this argument should not serve as the basis for medical legal claims.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据