4.5 Article

Two-step mechanism involving active-site conformational changes regulates human telomerase DNA binding

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 465, 期 -, 页码 347-357

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20140922

关键词

dyskeratosis congenita; enzymology; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; telomerase

资金

  1. Cancer Council NSW project [RG12-02]
  2. Cancer Institute NSW [11/CDF/3-05]
  3. Priority Driven Young Investigator grant
  4. Cure Cancer Australia Foundation
  5. Cancer Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase maintains telomeres and is essential for cellular immortality in most cancers. Insight into the telomerase mechanism can be gained from syndromes such as dyskeratosis congenita, in which mutation of telomerase components manifests in telomere dysfunction. We carried out detailed kinetic and thermodynamic analyses of wild-type telomerase and two disease-associated mutations in the reverse transcriptase domain. Differences in dissociation rates between primers with different 3' ends were independent of DNA affinities, revealing that initial binding of telomerase to telomeric DNA occurs through a previously undescribed two-step mechanism involving enzyme conformational changes. Both mutations affected DNA binding, but through different mechanisms: P704S specifically affected protein conformational changes during DNA binding, whereas R865H showed defects in binding to the 3' region of the DNA. To gain further insight at the structural level, we generated the first homology model of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase domain; the positions of P704S andR865H corroborate their observedmechanistic defects, providing validation for the structural model. Our data reveal the importance of protein interactions with the 3' end of telomeric DNA and the role of protein conformational change in telomerase DNA binding, and highlight naturally occurring diseasemutations as a rich source of mechanistic insight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据